Andrew Tates Criminal Defence Lawyer: Holborn Adams
On Monday, 29 January, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) confirmed that no criminal charges will be brought against Andrew Tate following a further review of the evidence supplied by Hertfordshire Constabulary. After careful consideration, the CPS concluded that its legal test for prosecution was not met, and therefore no further action will be taken on the criminal file.
As part of Mr Tate’s UK legal team at Holborn Adams, I welcome this decision. From the outset we have maintained that the material simply did not meet the CPS threshold for a realistic prospect of conviction. Monday’s decision reflects a process grounded in evidence and law, not external pressure.
Our position
Speaking for the defence team at Holborn Adams:
- We welcome the CPS decision not to prosecute.
- We maintain that the evidence is inadequate to support criminal charges.
- We will vigorously contest the civil claim through the proper legal process.
Our approach has been consistent: these matters must be judged by the quality of evidence and the rule of law. Monday’s outcome is a clear acknowledgement of that principle.
The Benefits of Pre-Charge Engagement
This decision also highlights the clear benefits of pre-charge engagement. As part of our ongoing efforts, I personally submitted representations to the CPS in this case just a few weeks ago. After a thorough review, the CPS decided not to bring criminal charges. This demonstrates that proactive, early engagement with the authorities can be highly effective in preventing cases from proceeding to trial.
In Mr Tate’s case, this pre-charge approach helped ensure that weak evidence did not result in a criminal case, sparing him from the trauma and uncertainty that often accompanies such proceedings. Pre-charge representation is an essential tool in protecting your rights and avoiding the escalation of unjust allegations.
Holborn Adams remains committed to ensuring that Mr Tate’s case—like any case we handle—is dealt with fairly, proportionately, and on the evidence.
References:
