R v N
Outcome: No further action
Following the submission of pre-charge representations to the police after the client was accused of perverting the course of justice, the client was granted a no further action. This no further action was appealed, and the client was then investigated for an accusation of perjury. After repeated liaison and pressure upon the officer in case on evidential grounds, the client was granted a further no further action.
R v M
Outcome: No further action
The client was accused of torture and battery abroad. The client and the alleged victim were citizens of the United Kingdom. While criminal proceedings against our client took place abroad, we drafted a crisis management bundle for the client consisting of a chronological statement, full binders of complex evidential material and an index referring to the same, which outlined the client’s innocence to pre-empt the matter proceeding to the United Kingdom. After liaison with the client and his international lawyers, the criminal case abroad halted and the client’s interests in the United Kingdom were protected against the unproven accusations.
R v B
Outcome: Significantly reduced sentence
The client was charged with a motoring offence involving alcohol and speeding. After a close inspection of the case, we advanced mitigation alongside Counsel in reference to strong medical and psychiatric evidence. This secured the client a favourable sentence in which the aggravating elements of the offence were set aside, with the client subject to a fine and a driving disqualification.
R v K
Outcome: Removal of Caution and Settlement
We provided advanced written representations challenging the process by which a client was awarded a simple caution by West Mercia Police. We identified that the officers in the case had bartered with the client in his police interview while he was experiencing suicidality and a severe depressive episode. The officers informed the client they would provide him with his personal and work devices back if the client accepted a caution. We successfully argued that the client was cautioned for an offence he did not commit, prompting the removal of his caution by the relevant Police and Crime Commissioner. We then entered into pre-litigation negotiations with West Mercia Police, securing a pecuniary settlement the client.
R v ZH
Outcome: Client released
Following representation at the police station, the client was accused of perverting the course of justice. The evidence relied upon by the police was rightfully identified as circumstantial. Client was later released under investigation.
R v A
Outcome: Acquitted
Client accused of murdering his former girlfriend. We formed a Defence team that secured the acquittal of the client with specialist Counsel.
R v L
Outcome: Acquitted of rape
Client attempted murder and accused of raping his wife following the incident. We formed part of Defence team alongside Counsel.
N v HMP
Outcome: Successfully brought action against prison staff
We formed part of legal team who successfully brought action against a British prison on behalf of client following injury and discrimination they faced. The client was an elderly Jewish prisoner who was discriminated against for wearing his kippa in canteen areas, who was denied Kosher meals, regularly facing anti-Semitic abuse from prison staff and was denied medical attention after his diverticulosis worsened, which partially immobilised him.
AH v SSHD
Outcome: Claim Settled
Claim settled with the Government Legal Department for the unlawful detention of a client who, if deported to their country of origin, would have had an extreme risk to their life as a transgender individual. The client had gained a recognised status in the United Kingdom, making the extent of their detention unlawful and their (potential) removal impossible.
HMRC v LM
Outcome: Ongoing
Retained to defend a client with allegations of VAT and income tax fraud. We have prepared written submissions to the CPS to the effect that criminal charges would not be in the public interest.
S v HO & Others
Outcome: Ongoing
Holborn Adams is retained by two clients in a vast cross-border human trafficking and a multi-million pound fraud investigation by both UK and Polish authorities. Our Senior Partner, Adam Rasul travelled to Poland to liaise with the clients’ Polish lawyers as part of a coordinated legal response. Written representations have been submitted to the CPS that the investigation failed to follow proper procedures and that the case should be reviewed at the highest level.
United States v EL
Outcome: Ongoing
Holborn Adams is retained to assist and advise on an international drug trafficking investigation conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Our Senior Partner, Adam Rasul, travelled to Washington DC and Virginia to represent the interests of a British Citizen implicated in a large-scale drug trafficking conspiracy. Adam is working jointly with United States Attorneys in preparation of the client’s case.
KH
Outcome: Ongoing
Retained to make enquiries into the police handling and conduct of an historic incident.
Q v I
Outcome: Ongoing
Instructed in relation to an appeal against sentence and Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 confiscation order in relation to conspiracy to supply Class A and Class B drugs to the value of £5,000,000.
W v LA
Outcome: Ongoing
Retained to advise on an appeal against conviction for murder (‘Joint enterprise’) where we did not act at trial. This involves detailed review of ‘what went wrong’ in the trial and investigating evidence and legal errors that may be used to overturn the conviction
S v KE
Outcome: On going
Represented a client in a wave of Operations by Greater Manchester Police of conspiracy to supply Class A drugs. This case involved consideration of a voluminous amount of telephone evidence and a large investigation across the North West.
R v NP
Outcome: No further action
Acted for a client cleared of attempted murder in the course of a ‘drive-by shooting’ in Birmingham following a successful submission of no case to answer.
S v KA
Outcome: Ongoing
Acted for a Czech national facing multiple rape charges and false imprisonment. A case that involved Czech translators and hundreds of hours of defence preparation.
U v I
Outcome: Not guilty
Assisted in the preparation and defence on a 14 handed corruption and perjury case, surrounding the notorious prosecution of the ‘Cardiff 3’ for the murder of Lynette White. This was the largest ever case of police corruption in legal history. The £30,000,000 prosecution ended in the collapse of the case and not guilty verdicts.
I v BI
Outcome: Claim settled
Represented a client charged with conspiracy to supply Class A drugs. This case was a multi-million pound international drug trafficking and confiscation case. Investigated by the SOCA and involved international jurisdictions and surveillance.
Y v E
Outcome:
Acted for the main defendant charged with Conspiracy to Murder. This involved extensive defence preparation of cell site analysis extending over 20,000 pages of evidence at the initial stages of the case.
S v RH
Outcome: On going
Acted for the main defendant in a conspiracy to supply Class A drugs, possession of firearms and human trafficking. Extensive surveillance evidence and hundreds of hours of audio product from probes placed in vehicles.
B v ND
Outcome: On going
Instructed to act for the main defendant in a conspiracy to supply Class A drugs. Prosecution and investigation brought by the Serious Organised Crime Agency (SOCA). Extensive preparation and review of hundreds of hours of covert surveillance and detailed disclosure applications to the Court.
T v DE & Others
Outcome:
Represented a client charged with conspiracy to supply Class A drugs and firearms offences.
UAE v JU
Outcome:
Instructed to draft an advice on UK law in respect of the use of cannabis for the United Arab Emirates Courts. The advice was translated into Arabic and was presented to the UAE courts on behalf of an overseas client.
N v PX
Outcome:
Represented the lead defendant on the largest commercial cannabis cultivation and supply conspiracy in UK History. Stock value estimated at £20,000,000 by the prosecution authorities.
HMRC v KD
Outcome: No further action
Represented a client (pre-charge) facing alleged offences, including fraudulent evasion of VAT contrary to the VAT Act 1994, investigated by the HMRC Criminal Team. We obtained medical evidence and other defence evidence as part of a pre-charge representations package.
R v LC
Outcome:
Acted for a client facing multi-million pound money laundering allegations. This prosecution arose from a previous case (‘Operation Shoot’) into this case known as ‘Operation Echogramme’. The case involved analysis of evidence from conveyance material stemming over tens of thousands of pages.
R v GY & UH
Outcome: No further action
Successfully defended clients charged with conspiracy to defraud to the value of £25,000.000. This case involved over 10 months of full-time preparation to test the allegations presented by HMRC.
S v EB
Outcome: Acquitted
Successfully defended a client charged with multi-million pound money laundering. This case involved criminal proceeds that had allegedly been transferred from Latvian bank accounts into UK-based companies. Due to the level of the client’s business activity, all aspects of his lifestyle were financially interrogated.
R v ND
Outcome: Acquitted
Acted for a Chartered Accountant charged with false accounting. After intense defence preparation with the assistance of expert forensic accountants, the client was acquitted after trial. The defence successfully exposed that the Inland Revenue staff were dishonestly taking bribes to process claims.
A v D
Outcome: Significantly reduced sentence
Represented a husband and wife investigated for mortgage fraud. Forensic defence preparation led to lesser charges being brought against by both clients and a non-custodial sentence.
U v V
Outcome:
Acted for the main defendant in a prosecution investigated by Trading Standards. The client was charged with 400 separate offences which involved thousands of pages of evidence on behalf of Nike, Adidas, Hugo Boss and other high-profile clothing brands.
S v L
Outcome: On going
Acted for a client charged with Copyright Fraud – prosecution by F.A.C.T (Federation Against Copyright Theft). The preparation for this matter involved taking instructions on over 4.2 million pages of evidence with a large defence team. One of the largest private prosecutions ever undertaken.
S v BD
Outcome: SFO Concluded Investigation
Acted for a Director investigated for fraud related offences involving a Professional Football Club. A case brought by the Football Association (FA) from events dating back to March 2001. The SFO took over the investigation, leading to 19 charges including false accounting, furnishing false information and theft.
W v YU
Outcome: Prosecuted by NHS Counter Fraud Team
Acted for a Senior Dentist charged with false accounting. The proceedings attracted wide media attention and was prosecuted by the NHS Counter Fraud Team.
Q v J
Outcome: On going
Acted for a Company Director facing serious money laundering allegations in relation to alleged criminal property. A multi-handed conspiracy at an alleged value of £4.2 million.
A v LD
Outcome: Significantly reduced sentence
14 handed corruption and fraud case involving Trafford City Council in Manchester. One of the largest ever investigations into alleged fraud by Senior Council employees. Client received a suspended sentence and walked free after an investigation that lasted 8 years.
E v YG
Outcome: No further action
Successfully defended a businessman against a European Arrest Warrant (EAW). The client was alleged to be a significant figure in a money laundering conspiracy in the Netherlands. The case outlined procedural errors in the EAW and continuous defence preparation revealed significant flaws in the investigation.
K v MJ
Outcome: Outcome
(‘Operation Euripus trial 5’) – represented a former Times Rich List client accused of money laundering from the proceeds of multi-million VAT fraud. The case involved prosecution and defence enquiries in Spain, Gibraltar, Dubai, Hong Kong, China and the Caribbean.
R v ZY
Outcome: No further action
Senior Partner, Adam Rasul successfully defended the largest VAT fraud recorded in UK history (£330,000,000). After extensive case preparation and a six-year investigation, the client was discharged from criminal proceedings and the matter was discontinued.
R v TC
Outcome: No further action
Successfully represented a Doctor pre-charge in relation to an allegation of domestic violence. Representations made on behalf of the client resulted in no further action being taken and no General Medical Council intervention.
R v DN
Outcome: No further action
Represented a client investigated for an alleged serious assault. After extensive pre-charge preparation, which entailed collating witness evidence and early representations, no further action was taken.
D v JS
Outcome: No further action
Successfully represented client on allegations of racial and threatening behaviour. Following pre-charge representations to the Reviewing Lawyer at the CPS and collating witness evidence, we persuaded the CPS that there was insufficient evidence to make a formal charge and no further action was taken.
S v EX
Outcome: No further action
Successfully represented client on allegations of racial and threatening behaviour. Following pre-charge representations to the Reviewing Lawyer at the CPS and collating witness evidence, we persuaded the CPS that there was insufficient evidence to make a formal charge and no further action was taken.
R v L
Outcome: No further action
Instructed to represent individual arrested in relation to coercive and controlling behaviour. Submitted pre-charge representations and due to the comprehensive nature of the representation, no further action was taken by the Crown Prosecution Service.
R v K
Outcome: Significantly reduced sentence
Represented professional individual in relation to a third drink driving offence and driving whilst disqualified. Holborn Adams successfully mitigated on the clients behalf, resulting in a stand alone suspended sentence order.
R v O
Outcome: No further action
Instructed to represent a client in relation to an allegation of rape. Holborn Adams put forward pre-charge representations which resulted in no further action being taken by the Crown Prosecution Service.
R v B
Outcome: Early release from prison
Successful representation at Parole Hearing, securing clients early release from custody.
Q v IL
Outcome: No further action
Successfully represented a high-net-worth client on allegations of racism and threats to kill. Following our early intervention, which included gathering key defence material, the client avoided police arrest and we persuaded the police and CPS not to make formal criminal charges. The client was able to retain his right to travel to the United States and Canada without restriction.
DWP v LB
Outcome: No further action
Holborn Adams successfully defended a serious pension fraud investigation. The DWP/CPS accepted Holborn Adams’ pre-charge representations. The client avoided criminal prosecution and further investigation.
DWP v CR
Outcome: No further action
Represented a vulnerable adult in a DWP criminal fraud investigation. Following negotiations and pre-charge representations, we persuaded the DWP to discontinue the criminal investigation and not to press formal charges against the client.
N v ON
Outcome: No further action
Successfully represented a Senior Doctor pre-charge in respect of an alleged multi-million pound fraud against the NHS. After intense defence preparation and preparation of a full bundle of defence evidence, no further action was taken against the client. The client faced a joint regulatory and police prosecution, and both investigations were discontinued.
HMRC v TC
Outcome: No further action
A substantial and lengthy investigation into a multi-million pound VAT fraud case was discontinued against Holborn Adams’ client. Following years of investigation, the CPS and HMRC accepted Holborn Adams’ detailed pre-charge representations and discontinued their investigation. As a result, the client no longer faced criminal prosecution or Confiscation proceedings.
HMRC v B and C
Outcome: Significantly reduce charges
An investigation that commenced in 2011 was brought to a successful conclusion by the Holborn Adams’ Serious Fraud Team. Extensive pre-charge representations at interview and powerful client statements resulted in an extensive list of charges being ‘dropped’ against our client by HMRC investigators. These included conspiracy to cheat the public revenue, conspiracy to undertake fraudulent activity, and making and supplying articles for use in fraud and money laundering. The value of the alleged crimes was estimated at £5,000,000.
D v MET
Outcome: Ongoing
Retained to bring a Civil claim agianst the Metropolitan Police for various failings on their behalf, including malicious prosection and unlawful racial discrimination.
T v E
Outcome: Property returned to our Client
Holborn Adams successfully worked on behalf of the client to secure the return of property considered as chatells under British Law.
Anonymous
Outcome: Ongoing
Holborn Adams are instructed on a retained basis to manage all legal affairs and PR related issues for a high-profile former premier league footballer.
Anonymous
Outcome: Ongoing
Retained to negotiate sporting contracts in relation to sponsorship deals and team contracts. Also involved in the management of all legal affairs and PR related issues
Anonymous
Outcome: No further action
Retained to deal with an ongoing criminal investigation by the Serious Fraud Office, lasting over two years.
R v L
Outcome: Caution
Client arrested for Criminal Damage. Following successful submissions to the Crown Prosecution
Service and police, after a charging decision had been made, we persuaded them to allow our client
to be re-interviewed which resulted in a caution being administered and the case before the
Magistrates Court was discontinued.
R v B
Outcome: No further action.
Client arrested for a serious allegation of Perverting the Course of Justice. Following extensive Pre-
charge Representations and instruction of medical experts by Holborn Adams, the Crown
Prosecution Service made the decision to take no further action.
R v G
Outcome: Significantly reduced sentence.
We were instructed to represent a defendant charged with possession of indecent images of
children and following successful mitigation we secured a non custodial sentence, when the offences
had crossed the custody threshold and argued that the imposition of a Sexual harm Prevention
Order is not necessary or proportionate in this case whereby it may have been the case that such an
order was imposed.
R v CH
Outcome: Significantly reduced sentence.
Defendant charged with a possession of indecent images of children, including the highest category
A images. Successfully mitigated before the crown court that a suspended sentence should be
imposed and not an immediate custodial sentence.
R v P
Outcome: No further action.
We were instructed to represent a defendant regarding allegations of Controlling and Coercive
Behaviour, Assault and an allegation of Rape. We successfully halted this at the police investigation
stage without the need for it to be reviewed by the Crown Prosecution Service.
R v S
Outcome: No Further Action.
Police investigation surrounding an assault on a young child. Police investigation and LADO
investigation concluded and investigations stopped.
R v I
Outcome: No further action.
Investigated for an offence of assault which was successfully halted at the investigation stage
without the need for written representations to be submitted.
R v N
Outcome: Acquitted after trial.
Client charged and prosecuted for an allegation of domestic abuse. Following a trial in the
Magistrates Court whereby our client was represented by Senior counsel, we successfully secured an
acquittal and they remain a person of good character.
R v F
Outcome: Significantly reduced sentence.
Defendant prosecuted for Criminal Damage; Graffiti caused to buildings, including religious buildings
and following successful mitigation at court Holborn Adams managed to secure a none custodial
sentence.
R v B
Outcome: No further Action.
Youth arrested for possession of indecent images of children. Pre-Charge Representations were
submitted and due to their comprehensive nature and instruction of medical experts, no further
action was taken although the evidential threshold being passed.
R v K
Outcome: No further Action.
We were instructed to represent our client at the police station following his arrest for a serious
allegation of Malicious Communications. This was halted at the investigation stage due to the
representations made by our police station representative at the police station.
R v B
Outcome: No further Action.
Holborn Adams were instructed to represent client in relation to an allegation of assault by
penetration on a child. The police sought further time to complete their investigation resulting in
them making an application to extend bail. This application was opposed by HA. Arguments were put
forward to the court thus finding in favour of HA. Following this, pre-charge representations were
submitted which resulted in no further action being taken.
R v S
Outcome: Discontinued.
Client was arrested and charged for failing to comply with DIP testing. He instructed Holborn Adams
post charge to represent him when he appeared before the Magistrates’ Court. HA made disclosure
requests and threatened an abuse of process argument. Disclosure requests were not fulfilled and
the matter was discontinued.
R v S
Outcome: No further Action.
Client was arrested after an allegation that he placed his mobile phone in record mode underneath a
cubicle in a family changing room. Following a defence bundle being complied, pre-charge
representations were submitted which resulted in no further action has been taken in this matter.
R V J
Outcome: Acquitted
Client was arrested for assaulting a police officer. Whilst on bail and awaiting trial before the Crown
Court, client was arrested again for another offence of the same nature. After a four day trial, the Jury
retired to consider their verdict. They were unable to reach a unanimous decision which resulted in a
majority direction being given by the Judge. Shortly after, the Jury returned a verdict of not guilty.
R v G
Outcome: Acquitted x2
Client is an international student who was charged with rape after allegations being made by two
sperate complainants. The case proceeded to a two week trial. Following trial, the jury returned a
verdict in relation to one of the allegations and were undecided in relation to the other thus resulting
in a hung jury. The Prosecution took the decision to commence with a retrial in relation to the
undecided matter. On day two of the retrial there was a lengthy abuse of process argument advanced
by Holborn Adams, which resulted in the case being discontinued.
R v W
Outcome: No further Action.
Client was arrested for a historical sexual assault on his step daughter. Following pre-charge
representations, no further action was taken.
R v CG
Outcome: Acquitted
We were instructed, along with the leading female KC in the country, Sallie Bennett-Jenkins KC, to represent a young client before the Crown Court for trial, in relation to very serious sexual offences. The defence advanced was that of reasonable belief as to the age of the victims at the material time; in that they were 16 years or older. There was a further allegation of Count on the Indictment of Rape, the issue in relation to this Count was one of consent. After a 2 week trial, during which we were able to argue the inadmissibility of certain evidence, the jury rightly acquitted our client of the 12 Counts on the Indictment. Had the jury returned guilty verdicts, it would have resulted in a custodial sentence of many years.
As a result of the preparation and hard work undertaken, our client has now resumed work in a heavily regulated profession in the City.
R v G
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
ex girlfriend alleged he had controlled her, and assaulted her whilst she was underage.
R v N
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
client sent monies to young individuals, prosecutors said for sexual
gain. Complainant’s mothers knew of the monetary gain they were making and did nothing about it.
R v S
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
In a relationship with tenant who made various allegations against him when he asked her and her daughter to move out.
R v T
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
Private school teacher who had allegedly made 40+ calls to a victim of her former partner’s. Prosecutors say it was to persuade her against giving evidence on court that
day.
R v Y
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
Former friend alleged that he roughed her up before forcing her to have sex with him. The defence retrieved medical evidence and pointed towards his lack of strength at the time due to stage 3 Cancer.
R v K
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
Alleged by younger brother that she sexually assaulted and groomed him many years ago.
R v U
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
caused his former partner a cut on her arm requiring 20+stitches - she said he dragged her across concrete, smashed her head on the ground multiple times, stomped on her head and the threw her into the shower to clean the blood off before driving her to the hospital.
R v N
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
Historical rape allegation
R v F
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
R v X
Outcome: JURY RETURNED VERDICT OF NOT GUILTY
R v U
Outcome: JURY RETURNED VERDICT OF NOT GUILTY
R v X
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
Allegation of rape historic sexual assault
R v N
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
Allegation of harassment
R v T
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
Allegation of sexual communication with a child
R v W
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
Allegation of sexual assault on a child
R v T
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
Allegation of rape
R v Q
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
Allegation of historical rape
R v U
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
Allegation of criminal damage
R v S
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
Exposing oneself to cause distress or harm to other
R v H
Outcome: CROWN DISCONTINUED THE CASE AFTER A CAUTION WAS ADMINISTERED.
allegation of criminal damage and assault on 14 year old son
R v L
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
threats to kill and inflicting injury causing Grievous Bodily Harm
R v I
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
Allegations of Rape common assault, coercive and controlling behaviour and harassment
R v R
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
Allegations included :
Attempted Rape, attempted to have sex without consent, Common Assault, Controlling and coercive behaviour.
R v E
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
allegation of sexual assault on a child
R v D
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
Grooming
R v C
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
assault
R v H
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
Sexual activity with a child
R v Q
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
Voyeurism
R v S
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
Allegation of historical rape
R v Y
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
Indecent images of children
Rex v H
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
Holborn Adams successfully persuaded the Crown to offer no evidence following our representations. This was a case against our client for an allegation of using a false instrument with intent.
Rex v SS
Outcome: CROWN DISCONTINUED THE CASE AFTER A CAUTION WAS ADMINISTERED
Holborn Adams successfully secured a caution a client under investigation for two counts of sexual
assault following our representations at a voluntary interview.
Rex v T C
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
Holborn Adams successfully represented a client who was arrested for rape shortly after graduating university. Within 4 weeks of instructing Holborn Adams and serving emergency representations of the police, the matter was concluded with no further action.
Rex v C F
Outcome: Acquitted
Holborn Adams successfully represented a client who was charged with assault of an emergency worker. After a two day crown court trial, the client was successfully Acquitted.
Rex v G E
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
Holborn Adams successfully represented a client for an allegation of distribution of indecent images of children and participating in an organise crime group for child abuse. The case was disposed of by way of no further action after successful Pre Charge representations to the Crown Prosecution Service.
Rex v A J
Outcome: Suspended sentence
Holborn Adams successfully represented a client for an allegation of distribution of indecent images of children. Although the charge passed the custody threshold, our client received a Suspended Sentence following our representations at court.
Rex v SS
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
Holborn Adams successfully represented a client who was arrested for Harassment and Stalking. Within 3 weeks of instructing Holborn Adams and serving emergency representations of the police, the matter was concluded with no further action.
Rex v SM
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
Holborn Adams successfully represented a client for an allegation of common assault. The case was disposed of by way of no further action after successful Pre Charge representations to the Crown Prosecution Service.
Rex v P Y
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
Holborn Adams successfully represented a client for an allegation of 10 allegations of Historic Sexual Abuse. All allegations were discontinued by the Teacher Regulatory Authority after successful Pre Charge representations to the Crown Prosecution Service.
Rex v N C
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
Holborn Adams successfully represented a client for an allegation of possession with the intent to supply class B drugs. The case was disposed of by way of no further action after successful Pre Charge representations to the Crown Prosecution Service.
Rex v L M
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER POST CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
Holborn Adams successfully represented a client for an allegation of harassment, intentional strangulation, and assault by beating. The case was disposed of by way of no further action after successful Post Charge representations to the Crown Prosecution Service.
Rex v J N
Outcome: Suspended sentence
Holborn Adams successfully represented a client for an allegation of sexual communications with a child and inciting a child who engaged in sexual activity. Although these charges pass the custody threshold, our client received a Suspended Sentence following our representations at court.
Rex v L C
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
Holborn Adams successfully represented a client for an allegation of possession of indecent images of children. The case was disposed of by way of no further action after successful Pre Charge representations to the Crown Prosecution Service.
Rex v M L
Outcome: No further action
Holborn Adams made successful representations for a client accused of sexual harassment in the workplace. However, a decision was reached where no claim was made at the Employment Tribunal and client was able to remain employed.
Rex v J C
Outcome: CROWN DISCONTINUED THE CASE AFTER A CHARGE WAS ADMINISTERED.
Holborn Adams successfully represented a client for an allegation of Criminal Damage. Despite being charged, Holborn Adams persuaded the prosecution to refer the case back to the police to issue an out of court disposal and the matter was discontinued.
Rex v L D
Outcome: Significantly reduced sentence
Holborn Adams successfully represented a client at court for driving under the influence of drinks/drugs. Despite being an offence, which carries mandatory disqualification, Holborn Adams persuaded the court to issue the client with a low level fine.
Rex v M J
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
Holborn Adams successfully represented a client for an allegation of common assault. The case was disposed of by way of no further action after successful Pre Charge representations to the Crown Prosecution Service.
REX V GBV
Outcome: Significantly reduced sentence
Holborn Adams successfully secured a non custodial sentence for a professional defendant charged with possession of indecent images of children. There was a subsequent argument regarding the imposition of a Sexual Harm Prevention Order which we argued was not necessary or proportionate to impose such an order, which the court agreed with.
Rex v SS
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
Holborn Adams successfully represented a client for an allegation of sexual assault. The case was disposed of by way of no further action after successful Pre Charge representations to the Crown Prosecution Service.
Rex v SW
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
Holborn Adams successfully represented a client for an allegation of fraud by abuse of position and money laundering. The case was disposed of by way of no further action after successful Pre Charge representations to the Crown Prosecution Service.
Rex v E B
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
Holborn Adams successfully represented a 16-year-old client at a voluntary interview for an allegation of sexual assault. Within 1 week of serving emergency representations to the police, the matter was concluded with no further action.
Rex v JW
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
Holborn Adams successfully represented a client for an allegation of improper use of public electronic communications network. The case was disposed of by way of no further action after successful Pre Charge representations to the Crown Prosecution Service.
Rex V RG
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
Holborn Adams successfully represented a client for an allegation of harassment, assault and criminal damage. The case was disposed of by way of no further action after successful Pre Charge representations to the Crown Prosecution Service.
Rex v JDK
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
Holborn Adams successfully represented a client for an allegation of a public order offence. The case was disposed of by way of no further action.
Rex v TT
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
Holborn Adams successfully represented a client for an allegation of administrating a substance with intent. The case was disposed of by way of no further action after contacting the police regarding Pre Charge representations.
Rex v RP
Outcome: Significantly reduced sentence
Holborn Adams successfully represented a client who was charged with six sexual offences against a minor, that could have resulted in a custodial sentence which could have lasted over a decade. After court proceedings, he was acquitted of five and sentenced two-month curfew as part of a community order.
Rex v KN
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
Holborn Adams successfully represented a client for an allegation of possessing a firearm. The case was disposed of by way of no further action.
Rex v CS
Outcome: Acquitted
Holborn Adams successfully achieved an acquittal on all three charges, two counts of breaching a restraining order and one count of malicious communications.
Rex v IM
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
Holborn Adams successfully represented a client for an allegation of assault occasioning actual bodily harm. The case was disposed of by way of no further action after submitting written representations.
Rex v RD
Outcome: NO FURTHER AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
Holborn Adams successfully represented a client charged with domestic common assault. This case was successfully discontinued within five days of instruction, preventing the case going to trial.
R v MR
Outcome: NO FURTHER ACTION AFTER PRE CHARGE REPRESENTATIONS
Holborn Adams successfully represented a client facing an allegation of historic rape. Through meticulous analysis and proactive engagement with the investigation, the team effectively demonstrated the insufficiency of evidence, resulting in the investigation being successfully discontinued within two weeks of instruction.
Request Call Back
