R v X (Fraud,Pre Charge)

Outcome: JURY RETURNED VERDICT OF NOT GUILTY

HMRC v TC (Criminal,Fraud)

Outcome: JURY RETURNED VERDICT OF NOT GUILTY

A substantial and lengthy investigation into a multi-million pound VAT fraud case was discontinued against Holborn Adams’ client. Following years of investigation, the CPS and HMRC accepted Holborn Adams’ detailed pre-charge representations and discontinued their investigation. As a result, the client no longer faced criminal prosecution or Confiscation proceedings.

HMRC v B and C (Criminal,Fraud)

Outcome: JURY RETURNED VERDICT OF NOT GUILTY

An investigation that commenced in 2011 was brought to a successful conclusion by the Holborn Adams’ Serious Fraud Team. Extensive pre-charge representations at interview and powerful client statements resulted in an extensive list of charges being ‘dropped’ against our client by HMRC investigators. These included conspiracy to cheat the public revenue, conspiracy to undertake fraudulent activity, and making and supplying articles for use in fraud and money laundering. The value of the alleged crimes was estimated at £5,000,000.

HMRC v KD (Criminal,Fraud)

Outcome: JURY RETURNED VERDICT OF NOT GUILTY

Represented a client (pre-charge) facing alleged offences, including fraudulent evasion of VAT contrary to the VAT Act 1994, investigated by the HMRC Criminal Team. We obtained medical evidence and other defence evidence as part of a pre-charge representations package.

R v GY & UH (Criminal,Fraud)

Outcome: JURY RETURNED VERDICT OF NOT GUILTY

Successfully defended clients charged with conspiracy to defraud to the value of £25,000.000. This case involved over 10 months of full-time preparation to test the allegations presented by HMRC.

S v EB (Criminal,Fraud)

Outcome: JURY RETURNED VERDICT OF NOT GUILTY

Successfully defended a client charged with multi-million pound money laundering. This case involved criminal proceeds that had allegedly been transferred from Latvian bank accounts into UK-based companies. Due to the level of the client’s business activity, all aspects of his lifestyle were financially interrogated.

R v ND (Criminal,Fraud)

Outcome: JURY RETURNED VERDICT OF NOT GUILTY

Acted for a Chartered Accountant charged with false accounting. After intense defence preparation with the assistance of expert forensic accountants, the client was acquitted after trial. The defence successfully exposed that the Inland Revenue staff were dishonestly taking bribes to process claims.

A v D (Fraud)

Outcome: JURY RETURNED VERDICT OF NOT GUILTY

Represented a husband and wife investigated for mortgage fraud. Forensic defence preparation led to lesser charges being brought against by both clients and a non-custodial sentence.

U v V (Criminal,Fraud)

Outcome: JURY RETURNED VERDICT OF NOT GUILTY

Acted for the main defendant in a prosecution investigated by Trading Standards. The client was charged with 400 separate offences which involved thousands of pages of evidence on behalf of Nike, Adidas, Hugo Boss and other high-profile clothing brands.

S v L (Criminal,Fraud)

Outcome: JURY RETURNED VERDICT OF NOT GUILTY

Acted for a client charged with Copyright Fraud – prosecution by F.A.C.T (Federation Against Copyright Theft). The preparation for this matter involved taking instructions on over 4.2 million pages of evidence with a large defence team. One of the largest private prosecutions ever undertaken.